Ever since last night’s class, I cannot stop thinking about the concept of silencing a writer during a workshop. I guess it just makes no sense to me. How could this ever be beneficial to a writer? In my previous understanding of a writers “workshop,” a possible read-aloud, a question/answer segment and any other constructive comments were the main elements that would be helpful to the writer. In workshops where silencing the writer is a deliberate action, I cannot see how the writer would be able to advance his or her piece of writing, without being allowed to voice their own opinion.
In our workshop that we participated in last night, if I had to remain silent, I would still be left with the crappy draft that I had from day one. Asking focused questions to my readers helped to gain a sense of what readers got from my piece and engage in a conversation with all of the members of my group. Keeping a writer silent during a workshop eliminates one of the most important elements of personal writing, voice. There seems to be quite a mixed message when writers are told to be silent during workshops, but also to make sure to have a strong and profound voice in their writing. That sure does not make any sense to me!
In my future classroom, I plan to have my students work in writing groups, partnerships and workshops, encouraging students to talk as much or even more about their pieces of writing as the others in their group. I find voice to individualize writer’s works and silencing them during their workshops would go against all I hope to teach and model with voice. What does everyone else plan to do in their classrooms when it comes to workshops and silencing the writer?